I got it up and running in full screen mode and didn't see much of a difference. VMWare released fusion 2.0 recently so I gave it a try, I imported my parallels VM (took about 2.5 hours, 90GB disk). I decided to give coherence a try, I messed with it for a couple hours but didn't like the way it handled the task bar and moving applications between multiple monitors, it wasn't very clean and it wasn't worth the hassle. I was recently working on a long project that I had to develop in windows and I found it annoying that I had my head turned to the left (the 2nd monitor is to the left) all day. I have a 24" iMac with a 22" monitor to the left of it. I have had no issues with parallels whatsoever, I use Visual Studio 2008, SQL Management Studio, an SAP product (and some AD management stuff) in it all without a hitch. It has always done great, I never used coherence because I generally had a second monitor connected when using it and I just used windows on one monitor and OS X on the other.
I have used parallels on my desktop at work for over a year and on my laptop at home since it's initial release. fusion but as VMWare just released fusion 2.0 I thought it was a good time to compare the two virtualization options (I know there are others but I don't think they are mainstream, or they don't advertise well). boot camp discussions and probably some parallels vs.
0 kommentar(er)
